Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jose Pereira vs Jacob Brumm Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Pereira vs Brumm analysis and find out who is favored!
Jose Pereira vs Jacob Brumm Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pereira has won 47.43% of points on his second serve, while Brumm has won 44.86%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pereira, in recent form, has won 51.06% of his opponent's second serve points, while Brumm has won 50%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.01% and 30.39% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pereira has saved 61.9% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Brumm has saved 45.24% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pereira has won 47.73% of matches played (W/L 21/ 23), with Brumm winning 38% (W/L 19/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pereira has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 107/ 65), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 396/ 266). Brumm has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 83/ 73), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 29% (W/L 4/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Pereira has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.52% of matches (W/L 17/ 16), where as Brumm has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 41.67% of matches (W/L 15/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Pereira winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Pereira winning 2 and Brumm winning 0. The last match between Pereira and Brumm was at the Concepcion Challenger, 22-04-2024, Q3, Clay with Jose Pereira getting the victory 6-0 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:29:21.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Pereira and Brumm have played a deciding set 0 times, with Pereira winning 0 times and Brumm 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Pereira winning 0, and Brumm 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pereira has played against opponents with an average rank of 225.23 while Brumm has played against players with an average rank of 219.6.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pereira has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Brumm has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pereira has converted 45.35% of breakpoint opportunities, and Brumm has converted 43.37% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Pereira 1 - 0 Brumm
557
Rank
232
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
725
Rank
691
High
25
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
60% (503-331)
Career Total W/L
51% (106-103)
48% (11-12)
YTD W/L
18% (3-14)
$625
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jose Pereira | Jacob Brumm |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:29:21 | 1:29:21 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (42/60) | 53% (26/49) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (31/42) | 65% (17/26) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (8/18) | 30% (7/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 0% (0/4) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (25/49) | 35% (21/60) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-3 |
Stats 
Jose Pereira
Player
Jacob Brumm
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
26 of
49)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jose Pereira | Jacob Brumm |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 48% (11/12) | 18% (3/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 47% (24/27) | 22% (8/29) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (231/214) | 39% (129/199) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 48% (10/11) | 23% (3/10) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.24 | 0.27 |
| Aces Total | 51 | 43 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.34 |
| DFs Total | 41 | 54 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:37 | 1:38:21 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 153.61 | 273.53 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (1037/1524) | 55% (562/1019) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (653/1037) | 62% (347/562) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (231/487) | 45% (205/457) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (78/172) | 43% (36/83) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (635/1453) | 38% (397/1047) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 53% (8/7) | 25% (3/9) |
| Futures W/L | 38% (3/5) | 0% (0/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 48% (11/23) | 18% (3/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/3) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (10/9) | 60% (5/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (10/1) | 40% (5/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 0% (12/0) |
Jose Pereira Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ergi Kirkin
Player
Jose Pereira
40%
(
38 of
94)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
48%
(
27 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
100
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
Player
Jose Pereira
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jose Pereira
Player
Franco Ribero
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Gonzalo Bueno
Player
Jose Pereira
52%
(
35 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
43%
(
15 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
72%
(
23 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jose Pereira
Player
Alvaro Guillen Meza
80%
(
107 of
134)
1st Serve %
77%
(
88 of
115)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
57%
(
61 of
107)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
48 of
88)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
46%
(
61 of
134)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
55 of
115)
128
Total Points Won
121
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jose Pereira
Player
Hernan Casanova
74%
(
69 of
93)
1st Serve %
73%
(
83 of
113)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
38%
(
8 of
21)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
38 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
56 of
113)
111
Total Points Won
95
|
6-7(4) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jose Pereira
Player
Ignacio Antonio Becerra Otarola
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
21 of
40)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
60
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jose Pereira
Player
Jacob Brumm
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
26 of
49)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jose Pereira
Player
Matt Kuhar
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
59%
(
16 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
Player
Jose Pereira
68%
(
57 of
84)
1st Serve %
72%
(
60 of
83)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jacob Brumm Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Jacob Brumm
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
88)
8
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Igor Gimenez
Player
Jacob Brumm
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jose Pereira
Player
Jacob Brumm
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
26 of
49)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jacob Brumm
Player
Bautista De La Pena
36%
(
14 of
39)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Jacob Brumm
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Jacob Brumm
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Brumm
Player
Oliver Crawford
56%
(
58 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
61 of
100)
5
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
4
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(0) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacob Brumm
Player
Rodolfo Jauregui Sainz De Rozas
42%
(
16 of
38)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Jacob Brumm
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Jacob Brumm
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
56)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Pereira Vs Brumm Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
